View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Learning Review |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-3 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
