methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage60-180 min60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
10-5012-100+5-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All