View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  UX Research Surveys |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 3-14 Tage | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 50+ | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | QuantitativeResearchValidation | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
