View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Operations Ivy Lee Method |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | With a restless workday full of too many open items, the method creates radical simplicity. It directs attention to a short sequence instead of a broad, still-open field. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 5-10 min daily | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 1 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Daily Priority List, Completion Notes | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationProductivityExecution | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
