View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 5-15 min | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-20 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
