View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  UX Research Diary Study |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-4 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 5-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | UX researchTrackingBehavior | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
