View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Kano Model | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions | ![]() Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






