View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Kaizen Event | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry | ![]() Operations Process Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 0.5-5 Tage | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | UX researchObservationContext | ProcessOperationsImprovement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






