View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 Interviews | 2-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






