View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 60-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






