View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 45-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 8-80 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
