View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 2-6 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-8 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | RiskRoot causeSafety | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
