View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-10 Kunden | 2-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
