View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 30-120 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-6 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | LeanObservationProcessOperations | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
