View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Systems Thinking Systems Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | UX researchObservationContext | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
