View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options |
Tags1 shared | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






