View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Impact Filter | ![]() Decision Making Argument Mapping | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With new ideas or requests, the conversation often turns to solutions too early and to effect too little. An Impact Filter forces the initiative into an effect perspective and checks whether it creates a relevant difference. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-45 min | 1-3 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Impact Filter, Success Criteria, Next Step | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes |
Tags1 shared | ImpactOutcomesFramingDecision | SensemakingDecisionRationale | RationaleKnowledgeDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






