View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-5 | 6-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






