View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45–75 min | 20-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Team members involved | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






