View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation How Might We |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Team API Document | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
