View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation How Might We |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 30-60 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
