methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
How Might We
Innovation
How Might We
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30–45 min1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-10NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea PromptsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix