View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation How Might We | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | 5-15 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






