View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk | ![]() Product Discovery Smoke Test | ![]() Product Discovery Pretotyping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-120 min | 1-5 Tage | Stunden bis wenige Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | Nutzertraffic | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision |
Tagsno overlap | LeanObservationProcessOperations | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | ValidationDemandMVP |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






