View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-120 min | 45-75 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | LeanObservationProcessOperations | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






