View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Operations After-Action Review |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 20-45 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | LearningOperationsImprovement | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
