View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 10-20 min je Frage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 6-50 | 3-7 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | LearningDialogueFacilitation | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
