View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Facilitation World Café | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | 60-180 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 12-100+ | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes |
Tagsno overlap | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | RationaleKnowledgeDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






