View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | 15-45 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatsame | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






