methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Purposedifferent
When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage30-60 min je Interview20-35 min
Participantsdifferent
Nutzertraffic5-12 Interviews1-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsTest Card with a pre-set threshold
Tags2 shared
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Paper illustration of Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix