View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 45-75 min | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






