View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 90-180 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






