View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 45–75 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | Team members involved | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
