View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






