View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 Wochen | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | UX researchObservationContext | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
