View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Decision Making Pre-Mortem |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-120 min | 20–45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | Small cross-functional group |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
