View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  UX Research Personas |  Product Discovery Test Card |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 1-3 Tage | 20-35 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | Internes Team | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Test Card with a pre-set threshold |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
