View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Agile Working Agreements |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 45-90 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | TeamCollaborationAgile | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
