View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
