View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Agile Planning Poker |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 2-5 min je Item | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-9 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
