View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 60-120 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-6 | 15-200 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






