View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Domain Modeling Domain Context Map | ![]() Agile Starfish Retrospective | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | Team members involved |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






