View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Architecture arc42 |  UX Research Usability Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 4-5 Tage | 1-2 Tage | 1-2 h je Session |
Participantsdifferent | 5-8 | 1-4 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | ValidationUXPrototype |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
