View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Half day | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tags1 shared | AutonomyRolesTeam | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
