View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Architecture C4 Model |  Team Design Team API |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-4 h | Half day initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Team API Document |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
