View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Tree | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() Decision Making Pre-Mortem |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 4-5 Tage | 20–45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 5-8 | Small cross-functional group |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionTreeOptions | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






