View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-3 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 5-30 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tags1 shared | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
