methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Stakeholder Mapping
Facilitation
Stakeholder Mapping
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h60–90 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-82-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasStakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis