View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 30-60 min | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-7 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






