View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Decision Making Decision Tree |  Decision Making Red Teaming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 30-90 min | 1-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 1-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | DecisionTreeOptions | RiskDecisionSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
